President Donald Trump has launched a wave of Section 232 tariffs and investigations, seeking to protect U.S. national ...

Ten CFR experts break down what the president's trade agenda has accomplished since he placed a ninety-day pause on his ...

As revenue falls 10%, Nike preps for $1B tariff hit At the same time, the brand is restructuring teams around key sports and touted “significant progress” on rightsizing its classic footwear ...

Senator Maria Cantwell marked the 95th anniversary of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act by introducing a resolution warning against repeating its economic mistakes. She highlighted its role in worsening ...

interos.ai, the AI-powered risk intelligence company, today announced the launch of itariffs, a breakthrough offering designed to give procurement, finance a ...

President Donald Trump last week took to Truth Social to tout a new tentative trade agreement with China, albeit one that only really takes things back to square one and leaves the tariff rate ...

The administration’s opponents should invoke Roberts court precedents to oppose the administration’s harmful policy agenda.

What is the Insurrection Act, and what happens if Trump uses it to quell LA protests? Trump bypassed Gov. Gavin Newsom to deploy National Guard troops to the city.

Companies say they are freezing hiring and investment to deal with shifting tariff policies, which is compounding an uneasy equilibrium in the labor market.

Ford CFO Sherry House also discussed what the Dearborn automaker is telling Wall Street about upcoming headwinds.

An argument that section 338 (d) of Smoot-Hawley is still alive and well, would have made section 252 of the 1962 Act a nullity, just as it would make section 301 of the 1974 Act a nullity.

Legally speaking, the key holding in both cases is that Trump's tariffs are not authorized by the statute his executive orders invoked—the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).