Jul 21, 2016 · Does using the 'catch, when' feature make exception handling faster because the handler is skipped as such and the stack unwinding can happen much earlier as when …

NoSuchFieldException e) { someCode(); } Remember, though, that if all the exceptions belong to the same class hierarchy, you can simply catch that base exception type. Also note that you …

I want to know if I can safely write catch () only to catch all System.Exception types. Or do I've to stick to catch (Exception) to accomplish this. I know for other exception types (e.g.

Jun 26, 2012 · For Java 7 you can have multiple Exception caught on one catch block: catch (IOException|SQLException ex) { logger.log(ex); throw ex; } Documentation: In Java SE 7 and …

May 18, 2010 · Within the catch block you can respond to the thrown exception. This block is executed only if there is an unhandled exception and the type matches the one or is subclass …

I think that this only works if you raise and then catch the exception, but not if you try getting the traceback before raising an exception object that you create, which you might want to do in …

Is there a way to catch both exceptions and only set WebId = Guid.Empty once? The given example is rather simple, as it's only a GUID, but imagine code where you modify an object …

Sep 27, 2008 · One related and confusing thing to know is that in a try- [catch]-finally structure, a finally block may throw an exception and if so, any exception thrown by the try or catch block …

Will Try-Catch capture all errors that @@ERROR can? In the following code fragment, is it worthwhile to check for @@ERROR? Will RETURN 1111 ever occur? SET XACT_ABORT …

37 You don't need to cover every block with try-catches because a try-catch can still catch unhandled exceptions thrown in functions further down the call stack. So rather than have …